Jan1977
Active member
- Joined
- 11 January 2025
- Posts
- 390
- Likes
- 1,452
- Image Editing
- Yes
I have done some quick testshots myself, hand-held, but it illustrates the challenge of macro and aspects of it. So I post here.
An about 1:1 frame of a key on my key ring, shot on f2.8 and close by, so shallow depth of field. This is the uncropped frame, but resized to 1600 long side.
Of the same photo, an about 1600 pixels long side crop of the original frame, exported to long side 1600 pixels:
In this second one, you see more blur, which you do not see in the resized frame that obvious. Shallow dof and difficult focussing, so hard to get the picture sharp. (For static macro shots, people often use atripod for a reason).
Here is a uncropped shot from further away, resized to 1600 long side of the same set of keys:
It appears much sharper, due to more distance to the subject, but still f2.8.
And a crop of about 1600 long side of this photo:
When we look at both of the crops, it clearly shows much more detail in the "true" macro crop (first crop in this post).
An about 1:1 frame of a key on my key ring, shot on f2.8 and close by, so shallow depth of field. This is the uncropped frame, but resized to 1600 long side.
Of the same photo, an about 1600 pixels long side crop of the original frame, exported to long side 1600 pixels:
In this second one, you see more blur, which you do not see in the resized frame that obvious. Shallow dof and difficult focussing, so hard to get the picture sharp. (For static macro shots, people often use atripod for a reason).
Here is a uncropped shot from further away, resized to 1600 long side of the same set of keys:
It appears much sharper, due to more distance to the subject, but still f2.8.
And a crop of about 1600 long side of this photo:
When we look at both of the crops, it clearly shows much more detail in the "true" macro crop (first crop in this post).