Jan1977
Active member
- Joined
- 11 January 2025
- Posts
- 390
- Likes
- 1,452
- Image Editing
- Yes
Friends, we should talk about this suggestion. Not sure it will always prevent a tie, but they would become less likely.
I was also thinking about the rule that in a voting week the runner up starts the new challenge if the host wins again. Maybe not everybody is keen to do that. How do you all think about changing that? One option could be to ask for a volunteer to do it (first to say yes gets the job).
Thoughts everybody? @Stiga and @RDWP ?
I think the different scoring with 5,3 and 1 may give more separation in the overall ranking, so I assume it is better than 3-2-1 on the long run. (It partially depends on the number of voters what scale for scoring is more suitable).
The suggestion that if the host wins again, the runner-up will be picked for the next challenge is a good one.
Furthermore it may be good to have guidance in case of a tie between photos. I suggest that if there is a tie for the position who gets to host the next challenge, the host can have a final vote in deciding who is the winner.
You do not want an additional round of voting, due to time constraints in starting the next challenge, so a swift decision is desirable. Another decider could be who of the tied photographers has hosted the challenge least, so he or she gets that chance to host. But as the challenges run longer, the adminstration of who hosted how many challenges, becomes a burden and unpractical.
I do not know the possibilities for polls, but it could be nice to have a poll to do the voting. A poll including the photos maybe to much work, but a poll with the names of the contenders, might be doable.